Prosecutors blast Michael Jackson

**imported_elp6n** · June 2nd, 2005, 08:44 PM

They haven't proven he's a pedophile. He's never been convicted of a crime against children. Additionally, the evidence in this case is weak.

**burton2019** · June 2nd, 2005, 08:45 PM

Of course not, he has money to keep peoples mouths shut.

**Rocky** · June 2nd, 2005, 08:45 PM

exactly. thank you! Didnt a counselor to the child actually say that the boy said he wasnt abused? i know i read that and i know im not wrong. its the same thing it was before, parents trying to get money from some wacko.

**imported_elp6n** · June 2nd, 2005, 08:46 PM

The accuser couldn't even keep his story straight during testimony.

I dunno - I just need more evidence to make that call.

**burton2019** · June 2nd, 2005, 08:47 PM

I haven't followed the case or read anything about it as well. These are just my opinions. But one fact we could probably agree on is he is a nutjob!

**imported_elp6n** · June 2nd, 2005, 08:47 PM

He is a weird weird little man. No doubt there.

**PVVikeFan** · June 2nd, 2005, 08:48 PM

Guilty or not, how many of us would feel comfortable leaving him alone with our children? The girls would probably be safe, but the boys .............................. Who knows?

**Diets17** · June 3rd, 2005, 01:25 AM

If I was a parent, I wouldnt leave my kids alone with anyone that I didnt know personally, and I didnt trust with them....and I dont trust very many ppl to begin with.